English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Lambs were weaned at the 12 th week of lactation and remained on the two ryegrass pastures at a stocking rate of 20 weaned lambs/ha. The lambs on Midmar and 121-A had average weaning weights of 26.19 and 26.20 ± 1.45 kg, respectively. An eight-paddock rotational grazing system, with 3.5 days spent in each paddock, was used. This allowed a 24.5 day re-growth period. The lambs were weighed weekly in order to determine the liveweight gain of each animal. Dry matter (DM) intake and digestibility of the weaned lambs were measured using n-alkanes as indigestible markers. The lambs remained on the two pastures until a marketable mass was obtained and were individually classified and slaughtered at Cato Ridge abattoir at the end of the trial. Results and Discussion The DM intake of weaned lambs was significantly higher (29 %; P < 0.01 and 21 %; P < 0.05) on Midmar than 121-A using the C31/C32 and C32/C33 alkane pairs respectively. No significant differences in digestibility were found between Midmar and 121-A ryegrass. In the first week after weaning, lambs grazing 121-A had a higher (73 %; P < 0.05) ADG (g/day) than lambs grazing Midmar. The post-weaning ADG of lambs grazing Midmar and 121-A was 164 and 185 g/day respectively. The lambs on 121-A ryegrass were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in mass than lambs on Midmar. After 77 days on the pasture, the lambs stocked at a rate of 20 lambs/ha on Midmar and 121-A and weaned at an average mass of 26.19 and 26.20 ±1.45 kg, respectively reached a final mass of 38.8 ± 1.78 and 40.45 ± 1.79 kg, respectively. The lambs on 121-A gained 14.25 kg post-weaning while lambs on Midmar gained 12.61 kg, despite the fact that the lambs had similar weaning weights. No significant differences were found for wool growth and warm or cold carcass mass. The lambs on 121-A had a significantly higher (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05) hindfat and forefat than the lambs on Midmar. The Rand/carcass value for Midmar and 121-A was R259.00 and R296.00, respectively but there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion Despite the lower DM intake on 121-A, the lambs outperformed those grazing Midmar, in terms of liveweight gains and carcass mass (although not statistically different). Although selection 121-A had a much higher (20%) DM content than Midmar, the DM content of Midmar in this experiment was probably high enough (180. 6 g/kg) not to have resulted in lowered intake by the weaned lambs. Observed differences in animal performance between the two ryegrasses were therefore possibly largely due to the 98% higher TNC content of selection 121-A.

The performance of weaned lambs grazing a high dry matter and nonstructural carbohydrate selection of Lolium multiflorum