English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A recent issue of a leading journal celebrated advances in the field of infectious diseases in the past 17 years. Some examples quoted were genome sequencing for real-time monitoring of the development of artemisinin– piperaquine resistance, the substantially improved outlook for people living with HIV-AIDS (including access to drugs), and vaccines to control the Ebola virus outbreak.[1] A recurring theme among all three examples is research, the quality of research, and methodology used therein. From the early controlled studies by James Lind for scurvy,[2] to the randomized study of the use of streptomycin for tuberculosis,[3] to the stepped wedge design (a study design that permits rigorous scientific evaluation albeit under logistic constraints),[4] or the basket and umbrella designs in cancer precision medicine,[5] the nature, repertoire, and complexity of scientific methodology has only grown. Given this, researchers and clinician researchers need to keep abreast of these changes to interpret and use evidence-based medicine (EBM) effectively. One way of doing this is through attending research methodology training programs.

Research methodology workshops: A small step towards practice of evidence-based medicine