English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article argued that Psalm 37 and Proverbs 1–4 served as sources for the composition of  Psalm 1. The emphasis in both donor texts on the righteous people’s inheriting the Promised  Land seems to have imprinted also on Psalm 1, a factor that could change our understanding  of it. All three contexts in turn played a role in the composition of Psalm 119, but whilst the author of this long psalm also understood the ‘Torah’ of Yahweh as the incarnation of true  wisdom, it seems that ‘Torah’ also subsumed the Promised Land for him. The investigation  showed that ‘Torah’ in Psalm 1 should be understood as an arch-lexeme for all the religious  texts its author used to compose, similar to what was the understanding of the author of Psalm  119 a little later.

Interpreting ‘Torah’ in Psalm 1 in the light of Psalm 119