English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

1 Bacigalupo F, Huerta D, Montefusco-Siegmund R The debate about death: an imperishable discussion? Biological Research ... 2 Bernat J, Culver C, Gert B Definition of death. Ann Intern Med 95: 652.1981. Imperishable or not, the debate about death, seems to be quite alive. This is at least what Bacigalupo, Huerta and MontefuscoSiegmund intend to show in a stimulating review1. The discussion of every issue raised in this quite comprehensive review is beyond the scope of this commentary. We will focus then, only on a single subject: ‘The problem of integration and the criteria of death’. More specifically, we would like to contend the proposed role of the Nervous System in somatic or physiological integration.

The vitality of death discussions: Comments on Bacigalupo et al., 'The debate about death: an imperishable discussion?'