English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article tries to think in parallel the notion of «inquietude» from an ontological point of view in Leibniz’s and from a social and political one in Montesquieu. This permits not only to compare two philosophies that has been little compared, but also to resolve one classical problem that often appeared in the interpretations of Montesquieu: this notion of inquietude could be thought as the «principle» of government of modern republic, that one that Montesquieu has never made explicit in his work. Consequently, the first part of the article will be dedicated to the analyse of some chapters of the book II of the News Essays of Leibniz, the second one to the chapter 27 of the book XIX of the Spirit of Laws .

De la continua agitación de las cosas: ontología, ética y política en Leibniz y Montesquieu