English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

I begin by examining some largely false leads from the Greeks in defining the nature of scientific citizenship in a democracy. Nevertheless, the lineage from Plato to positivism does provide a context for understanding the evolution of the modern conception of expertise and the distinct problems it poses to modern democracies. These problems revolve around issues of institutionalisation —specifically, how to design institutions that respect the idea of knowledge as a principle of social order without succumbing to rule by expertise—. After analysing two recent German proposals along these lines, I defend the institutionalisation of «consensus conferences», or citizen juries. Finally, I consider some the more general social epistemological implications of the role of «citizen scientist ».

La ciencia de la ciudadanía: más allá de la necesidad de expertos