English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The aim of our studies was to separate the effects of violating a sequential rule (genuine visual mismatch negativity; gvMMN) from the decreased activity in response to repeated stimuli (stimulus-specific adaptation; SSA) for simple and more complex stimuli. To accomplish this goal, different control procedures were applied with the aim of finding the correct control for vMMN studies. Event-related brain electric activity (ERPs) was measured in response to nonattended visual stimuli that were presented either in an oddball manner or in various control sequences. To identify the cortical sources of the different processes, the sLORETA inverse solution was applied to the average ERP time series. In Experiment 1, the stimuli were line textures, and the deviancy was different line orientations. SSA fully explained the deviant-related ERP effects (increased posterior negativity in the 105-190 ms range). In Experiments 2 and 3, windmill patterns were used. Infrequent windmill patterns with 12 vanes elicited gvMMN (posterior negativities in the 100-200 and 200-340 ms ranges), whereas in the case of the less complex (six vanes) stimuli, SSA explained the negative deflection in both latency ranges (178-216 and 270-346 ms). In Experiment 3, infrequent stimuli with six vanes elicited deviant-related posterior negativity within the sequence of less complex (four vanes) frequent patterns. We reconcile the discrepant results by proposing that the underlying processes of vMMN are not uniform but depend strongly on the eliciting stimulus and that the complexity difference between the infrequent and frequent stimuli has considerable influence on the deviant-related response.

Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) for low- and high-level deviances: A control study