English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Grammar instruction usually consists of explanation, feedback, and practice.Recent studies (e.g., Dekeyser &amp; Sokalski, 1996; Ellis, 1993, 1995; VanPatten &amp;Cadierno, 1993) focus on the relative effectiveness of comprehension andproduction practice in grammar instruction yet tend to treat the two forms ofpractice as mutually exclusive. Previous studies on input and output processingin second language acquisition, however, indicate that comprehension andproduction practice each play unique roles in the development of knowledge,promoting accurate and fluent language use. Suggesting that the two forms ofpractice can be complementary, this study examines the effects of combiningcomprehension and production practice in grammar instruction and considersthe role of practice in second language acquisition.

Comprehension and Production Practice in Grammar Instruction: Does Their Combined Use Facilitate Second Language Acquisition?