English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Minimum Letter Flips(MLF) and Weighted Minimum Letter Flips(WMLF) can perform the haplotype reconstruction more accurately from SNP fragments when they have many errors and gaps by introducing the related genotype information. And it is known that WMLF is more accurate in haplotype reconstruction than those based on the MLF. In the paper, we analyze two models under the conditions that the different rates of homozygous site in the genotype information and the different confidence levels according to the sequencing quality. We compare the performance of the two models using neural network and genetic algorithm. If the rate of homozygous site is high and sequencing quality is good, the results of experiments indicate that WMLF/GI has higher accuracy of haplotype reconstruction than that of the MCIH especially when the error rate and gap rate of SNP fragments are high.

The Correctness Comparison of MCIH Model and WMLF/GI Model for the Individual Haplotyping Reconstruction