English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper aims at promoting discussions about authorship at the juncture of the High School National Exam (Enem) essay test. Specifically, we intend to analyze how authorship is viewed and required in an official writing exam booklet, published in 2016. The theoretical-philosophical perspective that guides this study is based on the author's concepts in Bakhtin (2011), in interface to the author concept in Foucault (2006). The work is methodologically guided by an indiciary perspective (GINZBURG, 1986) based on a dialogic basis of observation. The results of the analysis indicate that the institutional view on authorship in Enem takes this process away from the dialogical field of subjectivity and brings it closer to a monological rationalization through writing.

A AVALIAÇÃO DA AUTORIA NO ENEM: DIÁLOGOS A PARTIR DE MIKHAIL BAKHTIN E MICHEL FOUCAULT