English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article analyzed the Institute for the Repetitive Demand Resolution Incident (IRDR) and how it has been regulated by the Federal Regional Courts. The objective is to expose the regulation of the procedure for the judgment of the Repetitive Demand Resolution Incident in the Internal Regulations of such federal courts, verifying the differences in the procedures and how such differences have been causing a use below their potential, in addition to a nonisonomic application by cuts in the national territory. The research used the deductive method and was carried out by bibliographic review on doctrine and analysis of legislation and jurisprudence.

brazilian journal of development

IRDR E OS REGULAMENTOS DOS TRIBUNAIS REGIONAIS FEDERAIS: IMPORTÂNCIA DA ISONOMIA DAS REGRAS / IRDR AND FEDERAL REGIONAL COURT REGULATIONS: THE IMPORTANCE OF RULE ISONOMY