English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Ethically challenging situations (ECS) are common in veterinary settings and can lead to moral stress. However, there is no published information about how a global pandemic affects the frequency and types of ECS encountered by veterinary team members. An online mixed methods survey was developed to determine the frequency, stressfulness and types of ECS experienced by veterinarians, animal health technicians and veterinary nurses since the advent of the global COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. Responses from 540 veterinary team members from 22 countries were analyzed. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, the median frequency of ECS encountered by respondents increased from several times per month to several times per week (Spearman Rank Correlation 0.619,  P  < 0.0001). The most common ECS (encountered at least several times per week) were:  challenging decisions about how to proceed when clients have limited finances  (64.4%),  conflict between personal well-being and professional role  (64.3%),  conflict between the interests of clients and the interests of their animals  (59.6%). These were followed by  challenging decisions about what counts as an essential veterinary service  (48.1%);  conflict between well-being of family/household members and professional role  (46.3%); and  challenging decisions about whether to perform non-contact veterinary visits  (46.3%). The most stressful ECS (reported to be very or maximally stressful) were:  conflicts between the interests of clients and the interests of their animals  (50.2%),  other  (42.9%),  conflicts between the interests of my employer and my own interests  (42.5%),  challenging decisions about how to proceed when clients have limited finances  (39.4%),  conflict between personal well-being and professional role  (38.0%), and  conflict between well-being of family/household members and professional role  (33.6%). Thematic analysis of free-text responses revealed biosecurity, client financial limitations, animal welfare, working conditions, and client relations as prominent themes. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study to describe the impacts of the pandemic on ECS experienced by veterinary teams globally. It identifies an increase in the frequency of ECS associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and a number of stressors unique to the pandemic. We identified a number of resources and strategies that may help veterinary team members navigate ethical challenges that may emerge in their daily work, as well as in the context of global crises.

Frequency, Stressfulness and Type of Ethically Challenging Situations Encountered by Veterinary Team Members During the COVID-19 Pandemic