English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The disequilibrium between lead-210 ( 210 Pb) and polonium-210 ( 210 Po) is increasingly used in oceanography to quantify particulate organic carbon (POC) export from the upper ocean. This proxy is based on the deficits of  210 Po typically observed in the upper water column due to the preferential removal of  210 Po relative to  210 Pb by sinking particles. Yet, a number of studies have reported unexpected large  210 Po deficits in the deep ocean indicating scavenging of  210 Po despite its radioactive mean life of ∼ 200 days. Two precipitation methods, Fe(OH) 3  and Co-APDC, are typically used to concentrate Pb and Po from seawater samples, and deep  210 Po deficits raise the question whether this feature is biogeochemically consistent or there is a methodological issue. Here, we present a compilation of  210 Pb and  210 Po studies that suggests that  210 Po deficits at depths &amp;gt;300 m are more often observed in studies where Fe(OH) 3  is used to precipitate Pb and Po from seawater, than in those using Co-APDC (in 68 versus 33% of the profiles analyzed for each method, respectively). In order to test whether  210 Po/ 210 Pb disequilibrium can be partly related to a methodological artifact, we directly compared the total activities of  210 Pb and  210 Po in four duplicate ocean depth-profiles determined by using Fe(OH) 3  and Co-APDC on unfiltered seawater samples. While both methods produced the same  210 Pb activities, results from the Co-APDC method showed equilibrium between  210 Pb and  210 Po below 100 m, whereas the Fe(OH) 3  method resulted in activities of  210 Po significantly lower than  210 Pb throughout the entire water column. These results show that  210 Po deficits in deep waters, but also in the upper ocean, may be greater when calculated using a commonly used Fe(OH) 3  protocol. This finding has potential implications for the use of the  210 Po/ 210 Pb pair as a tracer of particle export in the oceans because  210 Po (and thus POC) fluxes calculated using Fe(OH) 3  on unfiltered seawater samples may be overestimated. Recommendations for future research are provided based on the possible reasons for the discrepancy in  210 Po activities between both analytical methods.

Quantifying 210Po/210Pb Disequilibrium in Seawater: A Comparison of Two Precipitation Methods With Differing Results