English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Vascular access using a central venous catheter has become an essential component of modern medical care (1). The majority of venous access procedures were historically performed by surgeons (2). However, with the benefit of sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance, interventional radiologists have been safety performing the placement of central venous catheters (3). Several studies have reported a high technical success rate and a low complication rate for tunneled-catheter insertion via the internal jugular vein (IJV) using sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance (4-8). However, to our knowledge, there have been no reports comparing the outcomes of tunneled-cuffed catheter insertions among patients with different underlying diseases, such as kidney or hematologic disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of tunneled-cuffed catheter insertions placed radiologically via the IJV in patients with different types of underlying disorders. Original Article

daehan yeongsang uihak hoeji/daehan yeongsang ui haghoeji

A Single-Center Experience of 2153 Tunneled-Cuffed Catheter Insertions Radiologically Placed via the Internal Jugular Vein: An Evaluation of Technical Success and Complication Rates Relative to Underlying Disease Conditions