English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose: We quantitatively analyzed the therapeutic effects of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and dexamethasone implants used to treat macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion. Methods: Eighty-three patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with macular edema treated from February 2009 to August 2019 via anti-VEGF injections or dexamethasone implants were enrolled. The medical records of 83 eyes were retrospectively analyzed. Horizontal B-scan spectral domain optical coherence tomography images spanning the foveal center were obtained before treatment and 1 month later. These were analyzed with the aid of Image J software and the numbers of pixels corresponding to intraretinal and subretinal fluids calculated. Results: In patients with BRVO, the retinal fluid changes were identical 1 month after injection in both the anti-VEGF injection and the dexamethasone implant groups. For CRVO cases, the dexamethasone implant group exhibited a significantly higher loss of retinal fluid and thus a greater reduction in retinal edema than the anti-VEGF group. Linear regression analysis revealed that in BRVO cases poor final visual acuity was associated with a large amount of fluid at baseline and poor visual acuity 1 and 3 months after treatment. In CRVO cases, poor final visual acuity was associated with a large change in the intraretinal fluid level and poor visual acuity 3 months after treatment. Conclusions: The extent of anatomical and visual acuity improvement did not differ between the anti-VEGF injection and the dexamethasone injection groups with BRVO. For CRVO patients, the short-term anatomical improvement was significantly greater in the latter group, but the extent of vision improvement was significantly higher in the former group. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2020;61(11):1279-1287

Two-dimensional Quantitative Effects of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Dexamethasone Implants on Retinal Vein Occlusion