English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The study of the judicial resolutions of the Constitutional Courts is of great importance within our time. They express the legal reasoning that attempts to resolve the most controversial cases that take place in the highest courts of justice. One of these cases is the contradiction of thesis 293/11, which in Mexico refers to the restriction of human rights from international sources. Jurisprudential criterion that we analyze from the perspective of legal argumentation due to the high impact in the current context.

derecho global estudios sobre derecho y justicia

Las restricciones constitucionales de los derechos humanos en México a partir de la contradicción de tesis 293/11, análisis argumentativo y valoración ponderativa para la solución de principios normativos en conflicto