English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The objective of this paper is to define and characterize the hermetic plenitude of Law, providing an approximation from its origins. This principle is studied starting from the main models of the judicial function (legal formalism, american legal realism, Kelsen’s positivism, Hart’s judicial discretion and the model of Dworkin’s only correct answer), concluding that this may have less two meanings: one absolute and one relative, the second being more acceptable nowadays, given the importance that, in general, the principles in the application of Law have acquired.

La plenitud hermética del Derecho: ¿mito o realidad? Un acercamiento a la discusión sobre si los jueces crean Derecho