English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This Article puts forth the following working hypothesis by which it is asserted that on the basis of comparing certain interpretations of Article V-2b of the New York Convention with the notion of estoppel, such interpretations may be tantamount to a violation of international law. The method implemented to demonstrate the working hypothesis is hermeneutical-analytical and several examples of treaties in force or declarations made by the States are laid out to show how estoppel may be or is actually impaired. This Article is divided into two parts: the first one lays out certain preliminary clarifications from the doctrine and jurisprudential viewpoint and the second one examines the issue of States declarations and estoppel in the light of a recent ruling in Colombia. On the basis of the Article findings, it is concluded that States may be and need to be flexible as to trade and investment policies, but would need to be rigid as to the observance of juridical principles and values.

Estoppelyla Convenciónde NuevaYork. Contornoseconómicos de una aproximación hermeneútico- axiológica