English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

EnglishThe intention is to reconstruct and analyse the introduction of Quine's O sentido da nova logica to, in light of its historical justifications for the modern corollary logical system, seeking to defend the ontological neutrality that it's formal aspect allows. The distinction between naming and meaning at Quine's new logic, points out the fact that it's not necessary to "admit a kingdom of entities called meanings" (QUINE, 1985. p. 230) and that, therefore the formality of ontological statements assumes no ontological commitment. portuguesPretende-se reconstruir e analisar a introducao de O sentido da nova logica de Quine para, a luz de suas justificativas historicas para o corolario sistema logico moderno, procurar defender a neutralidade ontologica que seu aspecto formal possibilita. A distincao entre nomear e significar, na nova logica de Quine, ressalta o fato de que nao e necessario “admitir um reino de entidades chamadas significados” (QUINE, 1985, p. 230), e que, portanto, a formalidade dos enunciados ontologicos nao assume compromisso ontologico.

A neutralidade ontológica do aspecto formal da lógica moderna de Quine