English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: To determine if simulation is more effective than conventional exposition in the improvement in nurses’ knowledge of severe preeclampsia. Methods: Crosssectional quasi-experimental study in two private clinics in Cajamarca, Peru. We compared the improvement in nurses’ knowledge of severe preeclampsia: 13 attended to a conventional exposition about severe preeclampsia (Exconv) and 16, the experimental group, had the same exposition and four simulation training sessions (Sim). We conducted a pretest in both groups and a posttest in 20 participants; these were composed of multiple choice questions previously validated by experts; Spearman-Brown reliability was 0.76. The simulation training sessions were recorded in video and evaluated by an expert with a checklist adapted from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Data was processed with SPSS 20.0. We used Spearman-Brown correlation tests and Student’s t test for paired samples to compare the scores obtained in pretest and posttest, p <0.05. Results: The control group’s (Exconv) pretest and posttest scores were 11.69 ± 2.53 and 13.85 ± 2.27, p = 0.02, and pedagogical gain was 2.15 ± 2.88. The experimental group’s (Sim) pretest and posttest scores were 10.25 ± 2.79 and 14.69 ± 1.89, with a pedagogical gain of 4.44 ± 2.22, p = 0.000. The pedagogical gain of the experimental group was greater than that of the control group, p = 0.002. Conclusions: Greater improvement in knowledge was obtained by teaching severe preeclampsia with simulation training sessions than with conventional exposition solely.

Simulación versus exposición convencional en la enseñanza de preeclampsia severa