English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study deals with news coverage of some of the recent terrorist attacks in Turkey. It uses a data compiled for a project on impacts of journalism on countering violent extremism in Turkey (henceforth the CVE Project). The data is analysed using an eclectic version of critical discourse analysis. The analysis stats with an explanation of the data and the context of the terrorist attacks in question. Then the argumentation strategies used by newspapers are examined through pragma-dialectical argumentation approach developed by van Eemeren and Grootendorst. Metaphors are also analysed through the lenses of conceptual metaphor thesis proposed by George Lakoff. The findings show that arguments against terrorist attacks taking place in Turkey are highly marked by Turkey’s experience with the PKK terror and political stances. Metaphors used in news articles also reveal ideological and political treatment of the issue at stake. All in all, this study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between media and terrorism.

Terrorism and Newspapers: Representation of ISIL and PKK Terror Attacks in Turkish Newspapers