English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A beating tray and suction sampler were compared for their efficiency in sampling apple trees, and at determining the diversity of arthropods present in an apple orchard block managed for biological fruit production. Arthropods were identified to “recognisable taxonomic units”, and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index was calculated. The suction sampler consistently recovered significantly greater species diversity. Another experiment investigated the efficiency of the suction sampler, in relation to a subsequent destructive sample of foliage. The suction sampler collected ca. 60-70% of the taxa present on apple foliage under biological, integrated, or conventional fruit production. Suction sampling offered practical advantages but required greater laboratory input. Both methods could be used if their limitations are recognised, and require 10-15 samples for reasonable precision.

proceedings of the new zealand weed and pest control conference/new zealand plant protection/proceedings of the ... national weeds conference/proceedings of the new zealand weed control conference/proceedings of the new zealand plant protection conference

Comparison of suction and beating tray sampling for apple pests and their natural enemies