English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This paper argues that Marx‘ early citique of Hegel 1843 leads him, due to his materialisitic method, to a typical anarchist point of view. Despite the fact that both philosophers agree on a recent crisis of the social world, they disagree about the way this crisis could be solved. Marx follows Hegel in his analysis in which the social unity is divided by the differences between state and bourgeois society. But he criticises Hegel‘s attempt to mediate state and bourgeois society to a unity through the institution of the estates. Marx recognizes the main problem in Hegels Philosophy of Right is his method: He opposes his teacher‘s idealistic logic with his own historicalessentialist method. Obviously influenced by Feuerbachs Thesen, Marx argues, that state and bourgeois society could never be mediated, and that therefore modern humans live therefore by necessity unfree and alienated. Since bourgeois society and state hold on to different essence, only a revolution of both forms could end modern alienation. Furthermore, Marx‘ cursory comments on the unalienated, free and stateless society show great affinity to classical anarchist approaches. keywords: Marx, Hegel, Anarchism, Critique.

ANFÄNGE DES ANARCHISMUS. MARX‘ KRITIK DER HEGELSCHEN RECHTSPHILOSOPHIE UND SEIN POLITISCHER GEGENENTWURF