English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Cultural attitudes towards mentally and physically challenged and handicapped fellow-humans have changed from culture to culture and from century to century. But all cultures seem to have visible or hidden recognition of the dignity and uniqueness and sometimes divine characteristics of the handicapped. From bodily and mentally challenged acrobats and artists in the Chinese Imperial Court and the residences of European feudals to the divination of certain psychiatric persons in Eastern and Western cultures to limited legal rights of self-determination for the incompetent in many contemorary democracies, there is a wide range of acceptance and refusal of the u0027otheru0027 who is different to most of us. In this paper I will discuss more specifically some selected aspects of the genuine competence of those who have been declared legally incompetent in accordance with certain cultural preconceptions or neurological or psychiatric criteria for tests.

Balancing Autonomy with Paternalism for Psychiatric Patients？Ambiguities in Personal Choice and Adcance Directivesments