English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Since the birth of the United Development Party (PPP), the party bearing the Ka'bah symbol has often been beset by conflict, both in the form of individual conflicts or giving birth to factions in internal party conflicts. Both during the New Order era and up to the current reforms, the conflict that engulfed PPP was due to differences in opinion of the elites, especially about the prospective leaders who would be carried forward before the general election or the change of party leaders through the PPP Conference. Aside from differences of opinion on the internal elite side, conflicts are also caused by party institutionalization which tends to be formal in resolving conflict problems, including when PPP is often difficult to solve internal problems, thus giving an opportunity for external parties (government) to intervene or intervene in PPP conflicts. This has implications for the progression of the continuity of the PPP conflict after the New Order between Romahurmuziy and Djan Faridz. Keywords—political party, united development party, internal

Internal Conflict of Political Parties Post Reform (Case Study of Conflict Romahurmuziy - Djan Faridz in United Development Party)