English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Clustering is one of the main task in datamining. It is useful to group and cluster the data. There are a few ways to cluster the data such as partitional-based, hierarchical-based and density based. Partitional-based clustering is a way to cluster data with non-overlapping subsets. One of the most popular partitional-based clustering algorithm is K-means. K-means is an algorithm to cluster data in to K cluster and based their distance to its centroid. Due to the pational, a few factors that must be determined before using K-means is the value of K. Determining the value of K is a big problem because there is no universal way to find the value of K. Two popular ways to determine the value of K is using elbow and silhouette method. This method is graph based. But before using this method another factor is important to determine and that is the metrics distance that will be used. This paper will show the effect of three distance metric Manhattan, Euclidian and Minkowski in finding the value of K using elbow and silhouette method. Based on this study the choice of distance matrix used has little impact in determining the value of K in K-means using elbow and silhouette. Manhattan distance has the most variant in the elbow and silhouette graph. Elbow method is difficult to use and sometimes it is unable to define the value of K in Kmeans based on its graph.

Effect of Distance Metrics in Determining K-Value in K-Means Clustering Using Elbow and Silhouette Method