English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Quantitative PET/MRI is dependent on reliable and reproducible MR-based attenuation correction (MR-AC). In this study, we evaluated the quality of current vendor-provided thoracic MR-AC maps and further investigated the reproducibility of their impact on 18 F-FDG PET quantification in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Eleven patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer underwent 2-5 thoracic PET/MRI scan-rescan examinations within 22 d. 18 F-FDG PET data were acquired along with 2 Dixon MR-AC maps for each examination. Two PET images (PET A and PET B ) were reconstructed using identical PET emission data but with MR-AC from these intrasubject repeated attenuation maps. In total, 90 MR-AC maps were evaluated visually for quality and the occurrence of categorized artifacts by 2 PET/MRI-experienced physicians. Each tumor was outlined by a volume of interest (40% isocontour of maximum) on PET A , which was then projected onto the corresponding PET B SUV mean and SUV max were assessed from the PET images. Within-examination coefficients of variation and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted for the assessment of SUV variations between PET A and PET B  Results: Image artifacts were observed in 86% of the MR-AC maps, and 30% of the MR-AC maps were subjectively expected to affect the tumor SUV. SUV mean and SUV max resulted in coefficients of variation of 5.6% and 6.6%, respectively, and scan-rescan SUV variations were within ±20% in 95% of the cases. Substantial SUV variations were seen mainly for scan-rescan examinations affected by respiratory motion. Conclusion: Artifacts occur frequently in standard thoracic MR-AC maps, affecting the reproducibility of PET/MRI. These, in combination with other well-known sources of error associated with PET/MRI examinations, lead to inconsistent SUV measurements in serial studies, which may affect the reliability of therapy response assessment. A thorough visual inspection of the thoracic MR-AC map and Dixon images from which it is derived remains crucial for the detection of MR-AC artifacts that may influence the reliability of SUV.

Reproducibility of MR-Based Attenuation Maps in PET/MRI and the Impact on PET Quantification in Lung Cancer