English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Establishing equivalence within bilingual texts means saying the same message in different ways. Among numerous theories and views about equivalence is the theory which perceives equivalence as natural or directional. Within the theory, natural equivalence and directional equivalence seem to be quite the opposite but they are in fact interlinked. Bilingual texts composing of Indonesian text and English text are examined to reveal how equivalence, viewed under the framework, works. The examination reveals that the correspondence between constituents of both texts shows the features of: natural equivalence, directional equivalence and non-equivalence. The examination also uncovers the features of both natural equivalence and directional equivalence identified in a single construction. From this study, a brief sketch is obtained that natural equivalence and directional equivalence are not two extremes in the axis of equivalence but both form a tendency in terms of equivalence.

Checking Out Equivalence Within Indonesian English Bilingual Texts