English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

in the implementation of the Transpark Cibubur project, especially in Tower C Apartment there are several problems in conventional slab methods including the need for a longer construction time. With some thoughts and considerations, the work method of floor slab was changed from conventional method to metal deck composite slab method. In this research, a comparative of conventional slab and metal deck composite slab method in Tower C of the Cibubur Transpark Project is the object of research to compare the two methods to speed of implementation and cost requirements. The analysis results show in Tower C 16th to 19th floor for metal deck composite slab method is more expensive than conventional slab method with a cost difference Rp. 137.252.215,54. While in terms of work time, conventional slab method are longer than metal deck composite slab method with a time difference for 25 days. keywords : Conventional Slab, Metal Deck Composite Slab, Time, Cost.

COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL SLAB AND METAL DECK COMPOSITE SLAB METHOD TO TIME AND COST IN TRANSPARK CIBUBUR PROJECT