English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Work on the project floor Pondok Indah Mall 3 using plates bondek on basement area. Here I want to compare the effectiveness of the cost and time, why the owner and the contractor chose to use a plate bondek the basement area. This study aims to determine the differences between the two methods in terms of cost and time of work on the basement floor plates only at Pondok Indah Mall 3 project. Techniques of data collection using interviews and direct observations and combined with literature studies. Processing data using analytical methods of unit price (AHSP). The results of this research review time and cost. An observed work item is a work in the basement slab. From this research work price obtained slab bondek system more expensive, Rp 1,179,138,501 compared with the conventional method, in which the total price of the floor slab work bondek system is Rp 61,546,996,028, while the conventional method equal to Rp 60,367,857,526 As for the floor turnaround times bondek system requires 378 days, while the floor of conventional systems require 504 days.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVENTIONAL AND PLATES FLOOR PLATE FLOOR AREA BONDEK PIM 3 BASEMENT PROJECT AND COST PERFORMANCE AGAINST TIME