English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ABSTRAKTulisan ini mengkaji tentang Putusan Nomor 5/PID.SUS-ANAK/2018/PN.MBN tanggal 19 Juli 2018, yang memidana seorang anak berumur 15 tahun di Jambi dengan vonis enam bulan penjara dan pelatihan kerja selama tiga bulan karena melakukan aborsi kehamilan hasil perkosaan kakak kandungnya (inses). Terkait dengan tindak pidana perkosaannya, kakak kandung telah diputus dengan pidana penjara dua tahun (Putusan Nomor 4/PID.SUS-ANAK/PN.MBN). Penelitian ini mempersoalkan apakah putusan hakim dengan memidana anak korban perkosaan inses yang melakukan aborsi sudah mempertimbangkan hak-hak anak sebagai korban. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian diperoleh bahwa hakim tidak mempertimbangan hak-hak anak sebagai korban perkosaan inses. Pertimbangan putusan pidana oleh hakim adalah terdakwa telah memenuhi unsur-unsur perbuatan pidana dan unsur-unsur kesalahan, serta tidak adanya alasan penghapus pidana, sehingga terdakwa dianggap mampu bertanggung jawab secara pidana dan selanjutnya dapat dipidana.Kata kunci: aborsi, anak, korban perkosaan inses. ABSTRACT This paper analysis the judge's Decision Number 5/PID.SUS-ANAK/2018/PN.MBN on July 19th, 2018 who convicted a 15-year-old child in Jambi with a sentence of six months in prison and job training for three months due to having an abortion of pregnancy that resulting from the rape of her biological brother (incest). Related to the crime of rape, the older sibling has been sentenced to two years in prison (Decision Number 4/PID.SUS-ANAK/PN.MBN). This research questions whether the judge's decision to convict the child of incest raped that had an abortion have considered the rights of children as victims. This legal research uses normative juridical methods. The results of the research obtained that the judge did not consider the rights of children as a victim of incest rape. The consideration of criminal decisions by the judge is the defendant has fulfilled the elements of a criminal offense and elements of error, as well as the absence of reasons for criminal offenses so that the defendant considered capable of being criminally responsible and subsequently convicted. Keywords: abortion, children, incest rape victims.

PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP ANAK KORBAN PERKOSAAN INSES YANG MELAKUKAN ABORSI