English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The points raised are mainly addressing concerns against the original prioritisation method, described in „Prioritisation of infectious disease in public health – call for comments“ by Krause et al. in 2008. As mentioned in our article in 2011, the survey was launched in order to get outside expertise for improving the prioritisation methodology, as we were preparing a new round of prioritisation. The suggestions that the survey participants raised were included in our review of the method. As the authors of the letter repeat several of the concerns addressed by the participants, it should be pointed out that they were taken into consideration in the latest prioritisation.

Authors’ reply: Prioritisation of infectious diseases in public health: feedback on the prioritisation methodology, 15 July 2008 to 15 January 2009