English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The purpose of this article is to analyze, within the prism of the innovations proposed by the Judiciary Reform, with the creation of National Justice Council (Conselho Nacional de Justiça – CNJ) and specific guidelines for the creation of alternative means to the Judiciary, why the sentence culture is perpetuated as a paradigm of resolution of conflicts, to the detriment of the culture of consensus. To do so, we analyze the origin of the conflict, the specificities of the sentence and consensus cultures, and then establish the main obstacles to the substitution of the culture of the sentence by a consensual culture of conflict management. This paper adopts the hypothetical-deductive method of research and the documentary and bibliographic review, as a research technique.

ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND ADMINISTRATION OF LEGAL CONFLICTS: FROM THE SENTENCE CULTURE TO A CONSENSUAL CULTURE