English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background:   Differentiating between neurogenic and vascular claudication may be difficult. Vascular claudication due to aortic and iliac artery occlusions may present as low back, hip, and buttock pain while walking short distances. These findings are often very similar to those seen for neurogenic claudication attributed to lumbar stenosis.    Case Description:   A 68-year-old female presented with low back, right hip, and groin pain while walking short distances. She had previously undergone lumbar and cardiac surgery. Now, with negative repeated lumbar studies, the CT angiogram (CTA) revealed a dense calcified plaque in the right common iliac artery resulting in 90% stenosis at its origin and &lt;50% stenosis of the left common iliac artery. Once bilateral common iliac artery kissing stents were placed, the patient’s symptoms resolved.    Conclusion:   Spine surgeons should be aware that vascular and neurogenic claudication may mimic each other. Obtaining MR studies of the lumbar spine and EMG/NCV, along with the appropriate vascular studies (CTAs), help differentiate between the two, and result in the appropriate operative choices.

Differentiation of vascular claudication due to bilateral common iliac artery stenosis versus neurogenic claudication with spinal stenosis