English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article explains how John Rawls and Jurgen Habermas offer away out of the conflicts that occur in the tension between the state and political pluralism, ethnicity, and culture. This solution involves, in the first place, overcoming the deficiencies of individual liberalism regarding the consolidation of civic ties, solidarity and equity among citizens, and secondly, finding a bond that enables social cohesion, democratic political processes, and the solution of governance by consensus. For John Rawls, the solution implies the idea of overlapping consensus and public reasoning, and for Jurgen Habermas the concept of constitutional patriotism. The key idea is that both solutions involve the construction of a moral bond based on political values and on the principles of modern constitutionalism, which are deep-rooted in the political culture of democratic regimes with a constitutional review. Such bond implies going beyond a modus vivendior the mere tolerance between the ethnic, religious, cultural and sexual plurality in a political community.

prospectiva

John Rawls-Jürgen Habermas: A normative and procedural solution to the tension between the democratic state and the ethnic, cultural and religious plurality