English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

This text considers the ethical and political, unconscious and institutional stakes of the act of silence-breaking. What motivates an individual to declare that which has been kept hidden? Does breaking silence in order to accuse (oneself?) inevitably reinscribe a mode of power? What new silences are produced through acts of silence-breaking? Can a confession ever be subversive or revolutionary? In order to reflect on the way that neither silence nor speech can exist as an absolute sign, Catherine Mavrikakis intersperses a series of speech acts unveiling personal and family secrets with considerations of the different effects of confessions in the contexts of criminal jurisprudence, Presidential image-making, state apologies, talk-show traumas, and educational institutions.

Lois du silence, lois de la parole, ou comment penser avec Foucault les politiques du dire