English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article proposes that the UNHCR-supported “durable solution” programs for former refugees from Bosnia and Herzegovina and from Croatia were at odds with the actual exilic experiences of former refugees. It introduce homemaking as an essential aspect of a successful durable solution and proposes supplementing the usual ethno-politicized understandings of home in the specific context with analyses of the process of homemaking at different scales—house (dwelling), community (the wider space of settlement containing natural, cultural, social, and economic aspects) and nation. The article also argues that repatriation and local integration in the country of first asylum—two allegedly distinct and opposite solutions to refugee crises—should be viewed as intertwined processes within a broader transnational context. It is concluded that their combination brought a durable solution to refugee predicaments in the specific case. Resume Cet article propose que les programmes de «solutions durables» soutenus par le HCR pour les anciens refugies originaires de la Bosnie-Herzegovine et de la Croatie ne s’accordaient pas aux experiences vecues de ces refugies. Il introduit la notion d’etablissement de domicile comme un element essentiel d’une solution qui puisse reussir et propose de supplementer les conceptions ethnopoliticisees habituelles concernant l’idee d’un domicile que l’on trouve dans ce contexte particulier avec des analyses du processus d’etablir un domicile sur des echelles variees, notamment celle du domicile en soi (lieu d’habitation), celle de la communaute plus large dans laquelle l’installation a lieu, contenant des elements naturels, culturels, sociaux et economiques, et celle de la nation. L’article soutient aussi que le rapatriement et l’integration locale dans le pays de premier asile, deux solutions aux crises de refugies qui ont ete concues comme distinctes et en opposition, devraient etre considerees comme des processus complementaires et interdependants dans un contexte transnational plus general. Pour conclure, l’article avance que leur application simultanee avait apporte une solution durable a des problematiques de refugies dans le cas particulier dont il est question.

“Durable Solutions,” Transnationalism, and Homemaking among Croatian and Bosnian Former Refugees