English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Ethnic conflicts such as the one raging within and between the republics of the former Yugoslavia are producing alarming numbers of refugees and displaced peoples. Countries which are in close geographic proximity to these conflicts have been literally bombarded with asylum requests from victims of the ethnic wars in the former Yugoslavia. More than 400,000 refugees from the former Yugoslavia came to Germany in 1992 and 1993 alone (Bulletin 1993,740; Bundesminister des Innern 1994,4; and Kohl l993,6). Western Europeans fear that many more refugees will be forced to escape civil conflicts which may breakout orintensify in various places across Eastern and Central Europe, and the region of the former Soviet Union. In this light, Germany's new asylum law could be considered an exclusionary defense mechanism applied by a country which, due to its geographic proximity to many refugee producing regions, and its attractiveness as one of the wealthiest countries in Europe, has seen an explosion of asylum applications since the iron curtain was lifted, and ethnic conflict began spreading. In many aspects Germany's newly revised asylum law represents a major regression from its liberal predecessor. According to the new version of the Asylverfahrensgesetz, stipulations which automatically reject refugee claims from individuals who had come from a "safe country" (Art. 29a), who have insufficient proof for individual political persecution (Art. 25, 30), or who had crossed into Germany coming through a "safe third country" (Art. 26a), make it much more difficult

Undermining the Refugee Convention: Germany's Civil War Clause and Temporary Asylum