English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The objectives and representational efforts of European history have come up for interrogation from some quarters in the last two decades. The reasons for this lie in a wide recognition of a constructive relationship between knowledge and power. This critical impetus seems to have come more from Foucault's "power/knowledge" formulation and other associated attempts, than as an extension of Marx's theory of ideology, which was until then the primary critical tool for establishing relations between ideas and exercises of class power, class understood mainly as an economic form. Interest in Marx's notion of ideology dropped considerably in the Anglo-American academic world after the entrance of Michel Foucault's and Antonio Gramsci's works in translation, while social movements with no direct connection with class as defined gained momentum. Political economy receded into the background and cultural theories became highly prominent in studying politics. Whereas attempts at working in Marx with Foucault and Gramsci were rarer, there was a greater success in blending Foucault with Gramsci. This was achieved particularly through a manipulation of the categories "hegemony" and

Writing 'India,' Doing Ideology: William Jones' Construction of India as an Ideological Category