English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit is a condition where the internal rotation of the shoulder is smaller than the external rotation. That occurs due to a positional fault at the head of the humerus which is anthropoid where the head position is more superior to the glenoid fossa. Purpose: to prove whether the combination of Crossbody stretching and mobilization with movement is better than the combination of sleeper exercise and mobilization with movement in increasing the scope of motion of the shoulder joint with a glenohumeral internal rotation deficit. Method: This study is a clinical trial, which is a study with an experimental design pre-test post test group design. Number of samples Group I as many as 14 patients were given an intervention with a combination of crossbody stretching and mobilization with movement 3 times a week for 2 weeks, then in Group II as many as 14 patients were given a combination of sleeper exercise and mobilization with movement also performed 3 times a week for 2 weeks. Measurement of increased value of shoulder ROM using a goniometer. Result: (1) There was an increase in the value of shoulder ROM in Group I, the mean pre 45.00 ± 7.766, and the past 73.71 ± 6.799. The results of the related t-test showed the value of p = 0.0001 (p<0.05). (2) There was an increase in shoulder ROM values in Group II, the pre-mean was 47.29 ± 29.076, and the post was 76.71 ± 11.652. The results of the related t-test showed the value of p = 0.0001 (p<0.05). (3) There aren’t significant differences in Group I and Group II. Judging from the homogeneity test, the value of p > 0.05 then the results of the comparison test use post-post comparative test with independent t-test which shows the value of p = 0.413 (p> 0.05).

sport and fitness journal

PERBANDINGAN ANTARA KOMBINASI CROSSBODY STRETCHING DAN MOBILIZATON WITH MOVEMENT DENGAN KOMBINASI SLEEPER EXERCISE DAN MOBILIZATON WITH MOVEMENT DALAM MENINGKATAN ROM BAHU PADA KASUS GLENOHUMERAL INTERNAL ROTATION DEFICIT