English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Based on a review of the literature on competition, several hypotheses on the effects of competitive instructional set on both speed and accuracy measures were explored usin g a paired associate learning paradi gm, One hundred and forty second graders (70 boys and 70 girls) were randomly assit;ned to three instructional treatments: speed riompetition, accuracy competition and non-competition. The competitive groups were further divided into relative positions of win, lose and tie; subjects were equally divided by sex, Althou gh the subjects in the speed competition group performed significantly faster than subjects in the other conditions, no significant differences were found between any of the treatment conditions and the non-competitive condition on number of errors in performance, Indications were that males and females may employ a different strategy approach to noncompetitive situations but that both respond equally to a competitive situation. Several possible explanations for these results are discussed, The implications of these results for education indicate that care and caution should be used in applying co~petitive instructional sets as a un{versal classroom technique.

The Effect of Two Competitive Conditions and a Non-Competitive Condition on Performance and Retention on a Recognition Task