English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In Japan, some dentists use indirect-exposure (screen) films for intraoral radiography, without the use of intensifying screens. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether film speed, inherent contrast, and latitude of Japanese indirect-exposure films used without intensifying screens were comparable to those of direct-exposure (non-screen) films used for intraoral radiography. The characteristic curves of Kodak Ektaspeed ("E" speed) and Ultra-speed ("D" speed) films were used as standards for comparison. Indirect-exposure films without intensifying screens were extremely slow compared with direct-exposure "E" and "D" speed films. Therefore, they should not be used for intraoral radiography because they needlessly expose the patient to excessive X-ray radiation. The direct-exposure films Hanshin Hi-Fi and Hanshin New Silver were equivalent in speed, higher in contrast, and narrower in latitude than Kodak Ektaspeed film. In general, the indirect-exposure films had lower speed, lower contrast and wider latitude than the direct-exposure films. Their speed and contrast would have been increased if intensifying screens had been used. Therefore, indirect-exposure films without intensifying screens should not be used for intraoral radiography.

Sensitometric Comparison of Direct-and Indirect-Exposure Films used in Intraoral Radiography.