English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper examines the rhetorical capacity of architecture, and in   particular, “the rhetoric of architecture” rather than the usually examined   “rhetoric about architecture.” In this work, the rhetoric of architecture is   understood as codified visual and architectural conventions as a series of   transpositions that frame specific meanings other than and beyond visible and   spatial. Here the proposed “rhetoric of architecture” is also more about its   capacity as a “mnemonic tool” and about the “craft of composition” rather   than about persuading others or about representation based on exact likeness.   This concept is particularly significant in the creation of the sacred. By   focusing on the architecture of the critical building of the Holy Sepulchre   that enclosed the Tomb Shrine in Jerusalem as described by Patriarch Photios   in the ninth and Abbot Daniel in the early twelfth centuries, this paper   argues for the recognition of the mnemonic links that the Byzantines may have   used not only for remembering the Tomb of Christ, but also for their several   reconstructions of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem as well as for embedding   the meaning of Jerusalem and New Jerusalem in their churches built elsewhere

The rhetoric of architecture in the Byzantine context: The case study of the Holy Sepulchre