English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Nikola RADOVANOVIĆ Pacemaker Center Clinical Center of Serbia Dr Koste Todorovića 8 11000 Belgrade, Serbia nikolar86@gmail.com SUMMARY Introduction Chronic right ventricular pacing can deteriorate cardiac function. Consequently, pacemaker system upgrades are more frequently indicated. These interventions can be hindered by venous thrombosis. In literature, it is rarely described that this problem is resolved by implanting a new lead for left ventricle (LV) stimulation on the opposite side of the previously implanted pacemaker and then subcutaneously transferring it to the old pocket. Case outline A 75-year-old male patient was hospitalized due to a planned pacemaker upgrade in December 2015. A dual-chamber pacemaker had been implanted due to sinus node dysfunction in 2011. During the previous 18 months he had been complaining about symptoms of heart failure. An upgrade to the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with a new CRT-P device was indicated due to the LV dilatation with the ejection fraction decrease, clinical deterioration, and the presence of high percentage of ventricular pacing. In October 2015, the mentioned intervention was unsuccessful due to total left subclavian vein thrombosis on the side of the previously implanted pacemaker. Anticoagulation therapy was ordinated and the reevaluation was postponed. During this hospitalization, venography confirmed total left subclavian vein thrombosis despite the anticoagulation therapy. It was decided to implant a new LV lead on the right side and then subcutaneously shift it by pre-sternal tunneling to the previous left prepectoral pocket. The intervention was uneventful. The first controls have shown stable pacemaker parameters. Conclusion This case report confirms that contralateral lead placement and subcutaneous pre-sternal tunnelling of the lead is feasible and safe in patients with an implanted pacemaker, an indication for system upgrade and ipsilateral vein obstruction.

srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo

Transvenous lead placement and its pre-sternal tunneling to the contralateral side as a solution for pacemaker system upgrade in case of the subclavian vein thrombosis