English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

When communication and media scholars work shoulder-to-shoulder with communities, the research products are necessarily as dynamic, creative, and diverse as the community members involved. Although such active scholarship generates rich, socially impactful knowledge, it often holds scant value within the arcane world of faculty tenure and promotion committees, where single-authored academic journal articles are the bread and butter of academic careers. As a result, members of the public are left to work with university partners who are typically precariously employed, with little institutional backing for community collaborations. Drawing on the Community-Engaged Scholarship Partnership’s research into Canadian faculty assessment policies, this article will lay out the case for concrete academic reforms that recognize, respect, and professionally support the “square pegs” of community-engaged media research. Quand les chercheurs en medias et communication travaillent de pair avec les communautes, leurs recherches sont forcement aussi dynamiques, creatives et diverses que le sont les membres de la communaute eux-memes. Bien que de telles recherches actives generent un savoir riche et significatif, elles n’ont pas beaucoup de valeur dans le monde esoterique des comites de promotion et de titularisation, ou les articles ecrits en solo et publies dans des revues savantes sont le fondement d’une carriere academique reussie. En consequence, la communaute finit par collaborer avec des universitaires precaires qui n’ont pas l’appui institutionnel necessaire pour faciliter la realisation de leurs projets. Cet article a recours a la recherche sur les politiques d’evaluation du corps professoral effectuee par Community-Engaged Scholarship Partnership (« Partenariat pour la recherche engagee dans la communaute ») afin de proposer des reformes academiques concretes qui reconnaitraient, respecteraient et appuieraient professionnellement le « cas special » de la recherche sur les medias axee sur la communaute.

Claiming Space for Square Pegs: Community-Engaged Communication Scholarship and Faculty Assessment Policies