English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In light of the decisions developed by the Mexican Supreme Court during the last years, this paper aims to show the ways in which the principle of consistent interpretation has run along different lines of reasoning, sometimes without a particular direction and some others towards a functional orientation. It also presents not only a chronological but also a political and legal evolution of this tool, and analyses the impact that some decisions have had in the Court’s legal thinking in order to achieve a more flexible and dynamic perspective about the constitutional interpretation of rights.

Los rumbos jurisprudenciales de la interpretación conforme: alcances y límites sobre su aplicación en la Corte Suprema mexicana