English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It’s common to argue that constitutional dispositions with a principle structure have an opened content that requires a concretization through interpretation. However, several institutions assume this function (Legislative, Courts, the administration or the people itself), even if there is no clarity on their specific competence. In this context, the present investigation intents to identify the main responsible of fundamental rights interpretation, proposing their respective competence. We postulate that there is no neutrality in the constitutional interpretation; instead, it is an important amount of discretion and political legal creation. Acy, rule of majority, rights, quality of democracy, amnesty laws, Inter American system of human rights, conventionality control.

La interpretación institucional de los derechos fundamentales en un Estado democrático de derecho