English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The July 12, 2012, the Progressive Movement coalition that took the citizen Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador as a presidential candidate for Mexico, filed a lawsuit of disagreement, arguing that it violated Article 41 Constitutional requiring elections in Mexico are free and genuine, so that the presidential election be declared invalid. The Electoral Tribunal of the Judiciary of the Federation in Mexico, which is the maximum resolution mechanism electoral disputes in this regard, was the authority responsible for validating the election and publish the final results of the presidential election. The Judgment of disagreement was asked literally: “the nullification of the election [...], requesting a declaration of non-validity [...] for violation of the constitutional principles of free suffrage and genuine elections and the cancellation of the registration of candidate c. Enrique Pena Nieto’s campaign stops overshoot”. In this judgment are relevant issues that are analyzed from the perspective of international law of human rights.

cuestiones constitucionales revista mexicana de derecho constitucional

Análisis desde la perspectiva del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos del juicio de inconformidad para la invalidez de elecciones presidenciales de 2012 en México