English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights declared on the need for a deeper analysis of the scope of Article 4.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights, given that the Court’s jurisprudence had not addressed the right of life at conception in a recent ruling against Costa Rica. The Court’s justices considered as inescapable the need to draft an interpretation of the terms “conception”, “person” and “in general” contained in the above mentioned Article 4.1. To reach such consensus, the justices analyzed the evolution of the international human rights protection framework as well as an exegesis according to the current use of such terms, in both the systematic and historical spheres of the Treaty’s purpose and objectives. The result was an interpretation based on solid arguments, supported by scientific evidence and free of dogma and religious influences.

cuestiones constitucionales revista mexicana de derecho constitucional

Interpretación del artículo 4.1 de la Convención Americana sobre la Protección de los Derechos Humanos, sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, caso Artavia Murillo y otros (fecundación in vitro) vs. Costa Rica