English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

THIS ARTICLE DEALS WITH A SUBJECT OF CAPITAL IMPORTANCE: IS IT POSSIBLE TO GET TO DECLARE THE PATRIMONIAL RESPOSIBILITY OF STATE-LEGISLATOR AS A RESULT OF LAWS THAT HAVE BEEN DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL? AND, MORE IN PARTICULAR, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN SUPPOSING THAT FROM THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION OF SUCH LAW A SERIES OF INCOME IN CHARGE OF THE CITIZENS HAS BEEN DERIVED? IT IS ANALYZED THE NATURE OF SENTENCES OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, MAKING A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE HAVING A PROSPECTIVE ONE, AND REGARDING THESE LAST IT IS EXAMINED THE DOCTRINE APPLIED BY THE SPANISH SUPREME COURT ACCORDING WHICH IN CASES LIKE THESE AN INDEMNITY DECLARATION IN FAVOR OF EFFECTED ONES IS DUE, EVERY TIME THE REQUIREMENTS CONCUR TOTALLY TO DECLARE PATRIMONIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF PUBLIC ENTITIES.

Responsabilidad patrimonial de la administración derivada de la declaración de inconstitucionalidad de una ley